Internal legal costs: what belongs in the budget model

Interne Rechtskosten: was ins Budgetmodell gehört

Counsel fees are only part of the burn. Funders who model "external only" miss internal line items that decide whether Tranche 2 is viable — and claimants who load ordinary opex into litigation budgets distort underwriting in the other direction. This article defines what belongs in the internal layer of the cost stack, how to allocate it, and what funders exclude.

Keywords: internal legal costs, litigation budget, war room, data room cost, funder burn

Belongs in the budget model

  • In-house legal & compliance time — hourly or FTE allocation; incremental hours only
  • Project management — war room, tasking, vendor orchestration, status reporting
  • Data room & IT — hosting, OCR, access control, forensic images, chain of custody
  • Translation & local counsel coordination — especially cross-border — tie to UK/CH bundles
  • Board & executive review — often underestimated in group claims and regulated entities
  • Internal investigations — witness prep support, HR coordination on employee witnesses

Allocation methods funders accept

MethodWhen used
Hourly captureSmall matters, clear timekeeping
FTE sliceGroup claims with dedicated team
Lump sum phase budgetWar room months 1–6 with cap
Vendor pass-throughData room invoices with markup disclosed

What we exclude from "internal"

Ordinary business operations unrelated to the dispute should not load the litigation budget — unless incremental because of the case. Examples to exclude: routine sales travel, unrelated product R&D, generic IT maintenance not tied to discovery. When in doubt, ask: would this cost exist if the lawsuit disappeared tomorrow?

Interaction with document review

Internal PM often orchestrates external review vendors — double-counting happens when PM fees sit in both counsel invoice and internal bucket. Funders want a single owner line per function in monthly burn reports.

FAQ

Are internal costs recoverable? Jurisdiction-dependent — budget separately from recoverability assumptions.

Data room vs discovery hosting? Often split internal/external — disclose mapping.

AI screening fee? External screening ($50) ≠ internal PM — different bucket.

Anonymous vignette

Group claim: internal legal allocated 0.4 FTE for 18 months (€180k loaded), PM contractor €90k, data room €45k — €315k internal layer. External counsel €1.1M. Funder model that omitted internal layer showed false 22% underburn at month 12 when Tranche 2 was requested.

Burn report line mapping

Recommend separate GL codes: LEG-INT-PM, LEG-INT-DR, LEG-INT-GC, LEG-EXT-COUNSEL. Funders reconcile monthly CSV to model assumptions.

War room economics

War rooms run €15k–€40k/month fully loaded (space, PM, IT support, counsel coordination) on mid-size commercial matters. Six-month war room = €90k–€240k internal layer before external review spikes. Funders cap war-room months in covenants when burn reports show diminishing returns.

Data room total cost of ownership

Setup €10k–€30k, monthly hosting €2k–€8k, exit/migration €5k–€15k. OCR and translation surge costs during ingest. Compare duplicate review waste in seven spends when data room reorg triggers re-review.

Extended FAQ

Cap internal at % of external? Some funders use 25–35% rule-of-thumb — matter-specific.

Employee witness time? Incremental HR/legal coordination belongs internal.

Board and regulated entity costs

Listed companies and regulated firms incur board minutes, disclosure committee, and regulatory notification work incremental to litigation. Budget €25k–€80k annually on long matters — often missing from "counsel only" claimant spreadsheets.

Glossary

  • War room — dedicated matter coordination
  • FTE slice — fraction of employee time
  • Incremental — cost exists only because of case

Related reading on this site

Continue with linked pillars in this article and the blog index. Machine-readable catalogue: llms.txt. Cost stress-test: burn calculator. Live screening: agents section. Questions: [email protected]. All content educational — engage qualified counsel for your matter.

Illustrative only. Not legal or accounting advice. Map line items with counsel.

Related: cost stack, review curve, useless spends.

Anwaltskosten sind nur ein Teil des Burns. Funder, die nur Externes modellieren, verpassen interne Posten für Tranche 2. Definition der internen Schicht im Kosten-Stack.

Gehört ins Budgetmodell

  • Inhouse Legal & Compliance — inkrementelle Stunden/FTE
  • Projektmanagement — War Room, Vendoren
  • Data Room & IT — Hosting, OCR, Forensik
  • Übersetzung & Local Counsel — grenzüberschreitend
  • Vorstand & Management — Sammelklagen
  • Interne Untersuchungen — Zeugen, HR

Allokation

Stundenerfassung, FTE-Anteil, Pauschale pro Phase, Vendor Pass-through — je nach Matter-Größe.

Ausgeschlossen

Ordentliche Geschäftstätigkeit ohne Streitbezug — Test: entfiele der Prozess, entfiele die Kosten?

FAQ

Recoverable? Jurisdiktionsabhängig.

Doppelzählung PM? Eine Owner-Zeile pro Funktion im Burn-Report.

Beispiel

Sammelklage: €315k intern + €1,1M extern — Modell ohne Internes zeigte falsche Underburn bei Tranche 2.

Burn-Mapping

GL-Codes: LEG-INT-PM, LEG-INT-DR, LEG-EXT-COUNSEL — monatlicher Abgleich.

Nur illustrativ. Keine Rechts- oder Buchführungsberatung.

Verwandt: Kosten-Stack, Verschwendung.

← All posts← Alle Beiträge