On 16 December 2019, Litigation Financing DAO GmbH was incorporated in Vaduz. We launch litigation-financing.ai as infrastructure for measurable litigation economics — transparent costs, AI-assisted screening with counsel gates, and a blog that speaks plainly about burn, waste, and jurisdiction bands.
Keywords: litigation financing, litigation funding, non-recourse, case screening
Why .ai
Our legacy site told vital case stories — data breaches, crypto fraud — inside a template. The new site is built like infrastructure: one network for claimants, counsel, and funders, with economics visible before commitment. AI agents can pay for screening via x402 USDC; humans via Stripe.
What we publish
- AI & litigation — automation limits, hallucination controls, silo security
- True cost stacks — full stack, internal costs, Germany bands
- Waste & burn — seven useless spends, review curve
- Cross-border — UK disclosure, execution chains
- Agent intake — ChatGPT, Claude, MCP
Products on this site
- Burn calculator — stress-test waste percentage
- Case screening — $50 dossier gate, merits band, REF polling
- Case archive — migrated from litigation-financing.io
- llms.txt — LLM-indexable site map
Who we serve
Claimants exploring non-recourse funding, counsel coordinating portfolio matters, fund ops teams underwriting tranches, and developers integrating screening APIs. We are not a law firm — educational content and screening infrastructure only.
FAQ
Legal advice on blog? No — engage qualified counsel.
Funding guarantee from screening? No — committee process separate.
Contact?[email protected]
Editorial principles
- Plain language on cost — no agency fluff
- Anonymised product and methodology posts — no client names in screening content
- Bilingual EN/DE with JSON-LD for search and LLM retrieval
- Cross-links between pillars — start at cost stack
From litigation-financing.io
Case stories (Ledger, ShareWood, Buchbinder, etc.) remain in archive — separate from editorial screening and cost engineering posts.
How to use this site (five-minute orientation)
New to litigation financing? Read the cost stack first — it frames everything else. Considering AI screening? Read automation limits and silo security before uploading privileged material. Building an integration? Start with payment rails and agent intake. Cross-border UK matter? Disclosure checklist and execution chains.
Company facts (public)
Litigation Financing DAO GmbH, Vaduz. Incorporated 16 December 2019. We finance selected litigation and publish economics education — we do not provide legal advice on this site. Case archive content migrated from litigation-financing.io remains available under Cases for public interest matters (data protection, fraud portfolios).
Extended FAQ
Do you fund my case from the blog? No — contact via Kontakt or counsel introduction.
Is the blog kept current? Pillar posts updated as product ships — see retrospective.
LLM citation? Use llms.txt for machine-readable index.
Litigation financing in one paragraph
Non-recourse litigation financing pays defined litigation costs in exchange for a share of recovery if the case succeeds. Funders underwrite using merits, cost stack, and waste history — not narrative alone. This site explains the economics and offers $50 AI-assisted screening to triage dossiers before committee time. Screening is not a funding commitment. Counsel remains central for privilege, strategy, and settlement.
Reading order for new funders
Glossary
- Non-recourse — funder paid from award
- Tranche — staged funding draw
- Merits — funding confidence triage score
- Burn — monthly litigation spend
- x402 — HTTP payment for APIs
Subscribe and integrate
Email [email protected] for blog updates. Developers: OpenAPI and CLI docs linked from agent intake. Index for LLMs: llms.txt.
Related reading on this site
Continue with linked pillars in this article and the blog index. Machine-readable catalogue: llms.txt. Cost stress-test: burn calculator. Live screening: agents section. Questions: [email protected]. All content educational — engage qualified counsel for your matter.
Start with true cost of a lawsuit or year one retrospective.